Journal of Islamic Civilization and Culture

مقاصدِ شریعت کی حدود اور جنگی مقاصد کے لیے ایٹمی ٹیکنالوجی کے استعمال کا شرعی تجزیہ

2025-05-06T07:29:59+00:00

This research paper explores the use of nuclear technology for military purposes in light of the objectives (Maqasid) of Islamic Shariah. The primary goals of Shariah include the preservation of life, wealth, intellect, lineage, and religion. Since nuclear weapons cause massive destruction, loss of life, and long-term environmental damage, it is essential to assess their use through the lens of these objectives. The paper questions whether the defensive or offensive use of nuclear arms can be justified within the ethical and legal framework of Islamic jurisprudence. Drawing on classical legal principles, contemporary scholarly opinions, and current global realities, the study presents a balanced Islamic perspective on the legitimacy and limitations of using nuclear weapons in warfare.

انقطاع فی السند کے فقہی استنباطات پر اثرات :تجزیاتی مطالعہ

2025-06-12T18:21:05+00:00

According to jurists, muḥaddithūn (hadith scholars), and scholars of legal principles, there are numerous reasons that render a hadith impracticable. These reasons are generally categorized into two types: those related to the chain of narrators (isnād) and those related to the text (matn) of the hadith. External elements may contribute to this impracticability—for instance, a narrator’s weak memory, the loss of their books, the alteration of words based on personal perception or understanding, or discomposure in the wording of the hadith. These factors are considered central to defective (maʿlūl) ahadith, as they reflect external influences. As a result of such issues, certain ahadith or Prophetic traditions are deemed inapplicable or unreliable. When a muḥaddith or jurist examines a hadith through the lens of legal or critical principles, they may classify it as unviable and attribute its flaw to a hidden defect, known as an ʿillah. This ʿillah is the concealed reason that causes the hadith to be rejected and considered impracticable. Among various ʿilal (defects), one significant type is inqiṭāʿ—a break or discontinuity in the chain of narration. This discontinuity is a recognized cause for the rejection of a hadith in which it appears. Furthermore, it constitutes a fundamental reason behind the diversity of juristic opinions in deriving legal rulings within Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). This article explores the concept of inqiṭāʿ (break in the chain of narration) and its impact on juristic differences in the interpretation and application of Shariah rulings.

Violation Of Treaties in Accordance with International Principles

2025-08-04T07:25:46+00:00

Treaties are written documents that are concluded among states or international organization for a specific aim under international rules and principles. Each party has their own interests and aims in each treaty they sign, so this study elaborates the circumstances that terminate the international treaties, for instance mutual agreement of contracting parties, unilateral withdrawal by one party, termination of a treaty due to outbreak of armed conflict, desuetude (Obsolescence) of a treaty, conflict between successive treaties, emergence of a new peremptory norm.

The aim of this study is to clear the circumstances that breach the international treaties. Each occasion that terminates the international treaty is well discussed.

This study is important for all the states and international organizations, especially for those who are responsible for their foreign affairs, so this study will let them know all the ways and situations that abolish the treaty that have been in.

We have conducted this study library based, we have tried our best to use the well-known citation format, after all we have studied well enough regarding literature review and have mentioned them as well.

Finally, we have come up with the result that there are many occasions that put and end to an international treaty, like; mutual agreement, uniliteral withdraw, armed conflict. At the same time some political, military, economic, social and cultural pressures and forces also can terminate international treaty.